But like with all things, we'll have to wait and find out what happens.Īnd for the record, there are several good chat programs that are secure and open source, so your comments insinuating otherwise are nonsense. Are there aspects involved that make it sensible to open the source? Absolutely. So, do they need to open the source? Of course not. It actually makes little sense to keep it closed if they are allowing the use of it for free, and they've already stated they're opening the API. I'm testing the alpha now, but don't see myself using the final product if it isn't open source. Personally, I sincerely hope they do release the client source if they plan on providing a client in the future. And these were just a few possible scenarios. None of these possibilities stand in contrast to an open source release of the client. They could be planning on licensing deals with other companies. They may be planning to offer additional services for a fee for added security for those who require it. They may feel that being the company who put distributed, secure communications in the hands of the world will assist with future ventures. They may be developing Bleep for purely altruistic reasons. It is completely reasonable for Bittorrent to release Bleep as open source. #P2p messenger open source softwareYou don't think that opening up source for review is a realistic request when discussing software that is intended to keep your communications secure? Either trust them or don't? That isn't remotely close to a standpoint on the matter that anyone will take seriously. #P2p messenger open source freeFeel free to ignore folks like mfn! I need the app and based on your work with Sync I have faith in you. After going through tools such as Slack/Hipchat/Skype/Flowdock and others I have learned what is missing, and I hope Bleep can handle it.īest of luck with this very expensive adventure Bittorrent. Shoot, I would even pay for licenses for my whole office if it was reasonable. If there's a scrappy startup finally challenging Skype then I am behind them. #P2p messenger open source codeThat is unless you wrote your own BIOS, then compiled every line code after close inspection for every binary in use. There could be back doors built in just as there could be on the OS you are using. I am guessing this will be free, as it is now, and remain closed source, but they can do whatever they want without our permission. Giving away source code to the community is a gift. The tone of your message just sounds like Bittorrent owes you something, and they don't. Maybe you think it should be open source? Here's a deal for you: my company will make a Beep type chat program, free and open source, if you pay $1m for its development. Why would this program be open sourced? That would make it very difficult to recoup their investment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |